As the legal fate of the CPP is still pending, with an outcome that will have notable implications on RGGI allowance prices, clarifications regarding RGGI’s post-2020 cap will help reduce regulatory uncertainty in the RGGI market.
As part of their 2016 Program Review, member states of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) are examining opportunities to link RGGI with the Clean Power Plan (CPP), such as altering or removing the program’s Cost Containment Reserve (CCR) to address oversupply of allowances while preserving a mechanism to prevent price volatility. The alignment of RGGI control periods with CPP interim step periods would facilitate market expansion, as RGGI is the primary CPP compliance mechanism for member states and continues to draw attention from non-RGGI states. As the legal fate of the CPP is still pending, with an outcome that will have notable implications on allowance prices, clarifications regarding RGGI’s post-2020 cap will help reduce regulatory uncertainty in the RGGI market.
The advent of innovative technologies, new supplies, and changing relationships between utilities, regulators, and consumers is continuing to encourage the utility business model to evolve.
With increasing solar penetration, states and utilities are considering methods for proper valuation of distributed generation, with regard to potential cost-shift to non-solar customers, aggregation, and ownership models.
As the one-way electric grid evolves into an intelligent, two-way platform, ISOs and RTOs are tasked with balancing the impacts of the changing energy landscape together with public policy actions set at both federal and state levels. While ISOs can employ innovative market designs that can help state policies achieve their goals, challenges arise when policymakers impose conditions on the markets that cannot be priced. These challenges are further amplified when policymakers within a single market footprint take different actions that potentially contradict each other. EnerKnol’s Primer on Electricity Markets highlights these major driving changes in the wholesale markets, and more.
On May 12, 2016, New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo announced several new NY Green Bank transactions to fund solar installations and energy efficiency initiatives. With its evolving Green Bank, New York now joins Connecticut, which established first U.S. Green Bank, in leading the way to facilitate low-cost financing for clean energy by leveraging private capital. The success of Connecticut and New York’s green banks shows that public-private partnerships can outshine direct subsidies to clean energy and efficiency projects. As long as funding streams are available, green banks can amplify the impact of private investments and open additional sources of funds.
On May 19, 2016, the New York State Public Service Commission (NY PSC) issued an order adopting a framework for a ratemaking and utility revenue model under the Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) initiative (Case 14-M-0101). The Order is a major step forward in providing a framework for utilities to generate revenue as distributed system platform (DSP) providers under REV. Utilities will be required to develop retail markets for DER, such as solar, geothermal, wind, fuel cells, combined heat and power, battery storage, energy efficiency, and other advanced energy services.
On May 13, 2016, the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) announced its partnership with the Department of Energy's (DOE) Better Buildings Combined Heat and Power Resiliency Accelerator to foster combined heat and power (CHP) technologies for improved efficiency and enhanced resiliency. Multi-strategy initiatives such as the Better Buildings and Energy Data Accelerators, working in partnership with state and local governments, will have direct impact on utility Demand Side Management Portfolios, and the outcomes of state policies, such as those set in New York, could set precedent in other regions.
Illinois HB 6576 (Energy and Environmental Security Act), introduced on May 10, aims to support the hard-hit coal industry in the state by incentivizing clean coal generation. In a similar vein, the Next Generation Energy Plan, a comprehensive energy policy unveiled on May 5, includes provisions to support Exelon’s ailing nuclear power plants in Illinois. The implications from the Illinois bills --trying to influence market outcomes through out-of-market means -- will not only be relevant to coal and nuclear power in the state, but also for the debate over out-of-market versus market-based policy options in other RTOs and ISOs
On May 2, 2016, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a favorable environmental assessment for the Atlantic Bridge natural gas pipeline project that would supply New England states and the Maritime provinces of Canada. The project would provide additional firm pipeline capacity required to meet Northeast market growth and has preexisting agreements to account for its entire capacity. FERC has convened a technical conference to consider wholesale market rules that encourage firm capacity contracts to facilitate pipeline expansions and projects. Electric market design changes providing ways to recover the cost of firm pipeline capacity – where needed for electric reliability – would support existing and incentivize additional pipeline infrastructure necessary to alleviate constraints.
On April 19, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Maryland program to subsidize the participation of a new power plant in the wholesale energy market infringed on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) exclusive jurisdiction over wholesale electricity rates. The Court limited its ruling to the contractual structure of the Maryland program and specified that states may promote generation through other measures that do not intrude on FERC authority. FERC-state jurisdictional overlap will continue to grow as the energy landscape further evolves to incorporate new generation portfolios and comply with environmental mandates.
On April 18, 2016, a coalition of New York State electric utilities and solar companies jointly proposed a distributed generation compensation model that addresses cost-sharing issues in transitioning from net energy metering (NEM). As utilities and state regulators continue to debate over the valuation of solar power, the New York proposal could set a national precedent for utility-industry collaboration to support solar growth while addressing cost-sharing issues.
