Log in



Lost your password?
Login

Access the EnerKnol platform

EnerKnol
EnerKnol
Real-time Regulatory Data Streaming From The Cloud
  • ABOUT
    • About EnerKnol
    • Careers at EnerKnol
    • Press
  • PRODUCT
    • About the EnerKnol Platform
    • Why EnerKnol
    • Source Coverage
    • Get Access to the EnerKnol Platform
  • ANALYST RESEARCH
    • Alternative Energy
    • Environmental Markets
    • Fossil Fuels
    • Power & Utilities
    • View All Research
    • Get EnerKnol Research
  • EVENTS
    • EnerKnol Calendar
    • New York Energy Week
  • BLOG
Menu back  
 

PG&E Cannot Avoid FERC Review to Cancel Power Contracts in Bankruptcy

January 28, 2019

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission determined that it has concurrent jurisdiction with bankruptcy courts over wholesale power contracts that Pacific Gas & Electric Company may seek to reject through bankruptcy, according to a Jan. 25 order. The ruling comes in response to a request by NextEra Energy Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners L.P seeking commission action to protect their power purchase agreements with PG&E in anticipation of the bankruptcy petition. The utility announced its intent to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. bankruptcy code to deal with billions of dollars in potential liability associated with the 2017 and 2018 Northern California wildfires.

PG&E argued that NextEra’s petition is “speculative and hypothetical” as the bankruptcy has not yet occurred, and that the commission jurisdiction applies to sale and not purchase, implying that FERC is not authorized to order a buyer to continue to purchase power. PG&E also contended that the bankruptcy court will have jurisdiction over the issues raised in the petition and that there is no precedent to support commission jurisdiction over violation of wholesale power contracts.

The commission acknowledged the “unsettled state of law,” noting that in past cases several courts have read the Federal Power Act and Bankruptcy Code, reaching different conclusions. The commission concluded that a party to a commission-jurisdictional wholesale power contract must obtain approval from both FERC and the bankruptcy court to modify the filed rate and reject the agreement.

Share
TwitterFacebookLinkedInGoogle+
Related Research
Consumers Energy Asks Michigan Regulator to Set New Avoided Costs Consistent With Long-Term Resource Plan
February 18, 2019
TVA Votes to Close Two Aging Coal Power Plants Due to Unfavorable Economics
February 18, 2019
Virginia Legislature Passes Bills Aimed to Block Participation in Regional Carbon-Trading Programs
February 17, 2019
SCE&G’s 15-Year Resource Plan Proposes Solar, Gas-Fired Generation Additions
February 14, 2019
Delmarva Power & Light Proposes to Streamline Tier Structure in 2019 Solar Credit Program
February 14, 2019
Iowa Regulator Proposes Rules for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
February 13, 2019
NorthWestern Energy’s Peak Demand Deficit in Montana Would Improve From Federal Customer’s Hydropower Allocation
February 13, 2019
Competitive Suppliers Accounted for 77 Percent of Ohio’s Renewable Energy Compliance Requirements in 2017: Report
February 13, 2019
  • Alternative Energy
    • Biofuels
    • Electric Vehicles
    • Hydropower
    • Nuclear Power
    • Solar Power
    • Wind Power
  • Environmental Markets
    • Carbon Markets
    • Emissions
  • Fossil Fuels
    • Coal Power
    • Natural Gas
    • Oil
  • Power & Utilities
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Energy Storage
    • Smart Grid

EnerKnol
Copyright (C) EnerKnol, Inc. | EnerKnol, Inc. / Building 292, 63 Flushing Ave – Suite 409, Brooklyn NY, 11205 | (212) 537-4797 | info@enerknol.com | Terms & Conditions