Log in



Lost your password?
  • FREE TRIAL
  • ABOUT
    • About EnerKnol
    • Company News
    • Careers at EnerKnol
    • Press
  • PRODUCT
    • About the EnerKnol Platform
    • Why EnerKnol
    • Source Coverage
    • Get Access to the EnerKnol Platform
  • ANALYST RESEARCH
    • Renewables
    • Environmental Markets
    • Fossil Fuels
    • Power & Utilities
    • View All Research
    • Get EnerKnol Research
  • EVENTS
    • EnerKnol Calendar
    • New York Energy Week
  • NEWS
  • SUBSCRIBE
MENU
Login

Access the EnerKnol platform

EnerKnol
EnerKnol is the leading provider of regulatory data, analytics, and tracking software for North American energy markets
EnerKnol
  • FREE TRIAL
  • ABOUT
    • About EnerKnol
    • Company News
    • Careers at EnerKnol
    • Press
  • PRODUCT
    • About the EnerKnol Platform
    • Why EnerKnol
    • Source Coverage
    • Get Access to the EnerKnol Platform
  • ANALYST RESEARCH
    • Renewables
    • Environmental Markets
    • Fossil Fuels
    • Power & Utilities
    • View All Research
    • Get EnerKnol Research
  • EVENTS
    • EnerKnol Calendar
    • New York Energy Week
  • NEWS
  • SUBSCRIBE
Search:
U.S. EPA Proposes to Weaken Obama-Era Power Plant Mercury Rules by Revoking Cost Analysis

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued a draft rule proposing to determine that it is not “appropriate and necessary” to regulate hazardous air pollutant emissions from coal- and oil-fired power plants, rescinding a 2016 supplemental cost finding that formed the basis for the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, according to a Dec. 28 press release. The agency said that the projected annual compliance costs for MATS, which the Obama administration determined to range from $7.4 billion to $9.6 billion, “dwarfs the monetized benefits” estimated at $4 million to $6 million. The proposal does not repeal the requirements of the MATS rule, which have been in place since 2012 and with which, electric utilities have been complying for years.

In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the agency erroneously determined that costs did not have to be considered when making the “appropriate and necessary” finding. In response, the agency issued the supplemental finding concluding that the cost consideration did not alter its previous finding. In its latest action, EPA found that the co-benefits – which come from reducing pollutants other than those targeted – identified by the prior administration are insufficient to support the finding “in light of the gross imbalance of monetized costs and hazardous air pollutant benefits.” When the rule was issued in 2012, the agency emphasized that ancillary benefits, including reducing emissions of particulate matter and sulfur dioxide, which are not covered by MATS, would result in quantifiable benefits of $37 billion to $90 billion per year.

The proposal also includes a legally required eight-year “residual risk and technology review,” which found that no changes to the 2012 standards are warranted. Electric utility groups including the American Public Power Association, Edison Electric Institute, and National Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives, wrote to the EPA in June urging the agency to speed the reviews and leave the underlying MATS rule in place. The groups said that industry spent over $18 billion to comply with the rule, reducing mercury emissions by nearly 90 percent over the past decade.

Coal plant retirements were highest in 2015, due in part to stricter emissions standards required by the MATS rule, which took effect in April of that year, according to a Dec. 4 report from the Energy Information Administration.

Comments on the proposal are due within 60 days after publication in the federal register.

December 29, 2018
Share
TweetShare on Twitter Share on FacebookShare on Facebook Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

Post navigation

PreviousPrevious post:U.S. Lawmaker Proposes Trio of Bills to Boost Battery ProjectsNextNext post:New Jersey Approves Funding Method for 3.5-Gigawatt Offshore Wind Program

Related Research

Pennsylvania Sets Emissions Reduction Goals in Line With Paris Climate Accord
U.S. Energy Department Announces $155 Million for 16 National Lab Projects to Boost Industrial Innovation
January 23, 2026
U.S. Energy Department Overhauls Energy Loan Portfolio, Targets $83 Billion in Biden-Era Commitments
January 23, 2026
Ohio Regulator Approves FirstEnergy's Auction Results to Set Default Power Rates
New Jersey Governor Signs Orders to Freeze Rate Hikes, Fast-Track New Power Supply
January 22, 2026
U.S. Energy Department to Invest $120 Million in Research Center to Advance Next Generation Battery Technology
PJM Board Unveils 2026 Grid Action Package to Integrate Data Centers and Strengthen Reliability
January 20, 2026
FERC Proposes Broad Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation Reforms
Federal, State Leaders Call on PJM to Accelerate Baseload Generation to Address Surging Demand
January 19, 2026
New York Advances $485 Million Transmission Project to Enhance Grid Reliability, Support Renewables
New York Unveils Utility Accountability Plan to Protect Ratepayers and Ensure a Reliable Grid
January 16, 2026
DOE and NASA nuclear reactor on the moon
U.S. Energy Department Joins NASA in Ambitious Lunar Surface Reactor Project
January 14, 2026
Michigan Regulator Approves Energy Efficiency Programs for Low-Income Utility Customers
Illinois Enacts Legislation to Lower Utility Bills, Expand Battery Storage, Lift Nuclear Moratorium
January 12, 2026
  • Renewables
    • Biofuels
    • Electric Vehicles
    • Hydropower
    • Nuclear Power
    • Solar Power
    • Wind Power
  • Environmental Markets
    • Carbon Markets
    • Emissions
  • Fossil Fuels
    • Coal Power
    • Natural Gas
    • Oil
  • Power & Utilities
    • Energy Efficiency
    • Energy Storage
    • Retail Power & Gas
    • Smart Grid
    • Wholesale Markets

Subscribe To Our Research Newsletter!


First Name *
Last Name *
Email Address *
Phone *
Company *
Job Title *
Select any sectors you're interested in

Submit Form
https://enerknol.com/u-s-epa-proposes-to-weaken-obama-era-power-plant-mercury-rules-by-revoking-cost-analysis
EnerKnol
Copyright (C) EnerKnol, Inc. | 175 Greenwich Street, FL-38 New York, NY 10007 | (212) 537-4797 | sales@enerknol.com | Terms & Conditions       Visit EnerKnol on YouTube  Visit EnerKnol on Facebook  Visit EnerKnol on Twitter  Visit EnerKnol on LinkedIn